Skip to content
HowFindableScan
All storiesCase study

Nailpal scored 63 and 47. After fixing what the scan flagged, 95 and 95.

nailpal.app·June 2026·3 min read
SEOGoogle

before

63

after

95

AEOAI / LLM

before

47

after

95

Who they are

Nailpal is a nail-care app with a real product and real users. The thing worked. What it didn't have was a site machines could read: Google saw a thin, unclear page, and AI answer engines couldn't tell what Nailpal was or who it was for.

Plenty of sites are in this exact spot. The product is fine, but the signals search engines and AI rely on are missing or only half there, so all that work stays invisible to the systems people now use to find things.

What the scan found

One scan returned two scores, a 63 for Google and a 47 for AI, and a plain-English list of what was holding the site back. No jargon, no guesswork, just the specific gaps in the order that mattered:

  • No structured data, so AI had no way to confirm what Nailpal actually is
  • Open Graph and canonical tags missing, so shared links looked bare and ranking risked being split across addresses
  • A homepage too thin for Google or AI to understand the product at a glance
  • Nothing pointing crawlers at the pages that matter

The result

With the list in hand, every gap got closed: structured data added, the tags fixed, the homepage sharpened so a machine can tell what Nailpal is in a sentence.

The re-scan said it best. SEO went from 63 to 95 and AEO from 47 to 95, measured live on the site. Same product, now readable by the systems people use to find it. The scan didn't do the work, it pointed at exactly where the work was.

I expected a pat on the back and got a 63 for Google and a 47 for AI. The report spelled out what was missing, in plain English, no jargon. I worked the list and landed at 95 and 95.

C.L.

Founder of Nailpal.app

Want your success story here?

Scan your site free, fix it with HowFindable, and your story could be next.

Scan your site